In recent conversations with partners across the legal market – from international firms to City firms, boutiques, and beyond – I’ve noticed a clear divide when it comes to US law firms in London.
When I approach someone about a role at one of our US clients, the reaction typically goes one of two ways. Some partners are intrigued by US firms; drawn by the international scope, pragmatic mindset, attractive compensation packages and the chance to be part of something growing and dynamic. They value the entrepreneurial spirit of their US colleagues, their solutions-driven approach and often see it as an exciting career move and a way to expand their US (and International) network.
Others, however, are quick to close the door. And lately, political developments in the US have added another layer of hesitation. For some, joining a US firm feels too uncertain – a step into a system that might not align with their values or long-term vision.
Then there’s the perception problem: that all US firms are high-pressure, “eat what you kill” environments with limited autonomy, little say in partnership decisions, inflexible US-based leadership and rates that won’t suit their UK or other international existing clients. But that’s not the whole story.
There are several US Law Firms in London that have built successful, collaborative and collegiate teams many of which have merged with UK firms or hired widely from both US and UK practices. These firms invest significantly in their European offices and recognise their strategic importance. Their compensation structures reflect this approach and they offer flexibility when it comes to partner rates and client relationships.
It’s a shame when a strong opportunity is dismissed based solely on the name or nationality of a firm, i.e. ‘the perception’ when it comes to US firms.
If you ever consider a move, whether to a US, City, boutique, or international practice, I’d be happy to have a confidential conversation and help you understand the nuances behind these different law firms.